When dealing with EBP, you will often hear about the “best” evidence. This means two things:
Imagine you had a patient with recurring, painful acne. What kind of research would you seek to help deliver a treatment: a systematic review of several randomized controlled trials of treatments for this condition, a single case study of a patient experiencing similar symptoms, or your colleague’s third cousin, who once mentioned that “chocolate causes acne”?
These are all forms of evidence—even the last one!—but something like a systematic review, which amasses data from numerous studies to create generalizable results, will provide the broadest view of the evidence on your patient’s condition and help you devise an evidence-based treatment plan.
However, sometimes the very high levels of evidence aren’t available. As you seek higher levels of evidence, they become less common, as shown in the pyramid above. With an especially narrow topic, or one about a new phenomenon, a single case study may be the best you can find. Additionally, for some types of questions—etiology or harm, for instance—it may not be ethically possible for a randomized controlled trial to exist.